From: AL-KERNEL <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CVE-2026-98525][MODERATE 7.0] mctp: route: iterate socket tag list in mctp_lookup_prealloc_tag()
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:45:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
CVE: CVE-2026-98525
Priority: MODERATE 7.0
AL-KERNEL base severity: MODERATE
KPANIC flag: YES
Patch: mctp: route: iterate socket tag list in mctp_lookup_prealloc_tag()
Commit: 09299addab11857e92eca55cd8ef3350b927c90c
Upstream patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=09299addab11857e92eca55cd8ef3350b927c90c
Original CVE announcement: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-98525
Analysis date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 06:45:51 -0400
ActionableScore: 5
ActionableScore lower bound: unknown
Actionable bucket: Actionable Moderate / Strong Important candidate requiring manual review
Manual review required: YES
Summary:
A local MCTP socket can bypass per-socket tag ownership and transmit with and consume another socket's preallocated tag in the same network namespace.
======================================================================
ABOUT THIS REPORT
======================================================================
The original Linux kernel CVE announcement for CVE-2026-98525 is available here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-98525
The original announcement does not normally provide a security severity
estimate, CVSS assessment, or enough information to determine whether the
reported kernel bug represents a practically relevant security issue.
This report was generated by AL-KERNEL, an AI-assisted Linux kernel
vulnerability analysis system developed by Alexander Larkin. It combines
an autonomous classifier with LLM-assisted technical analysis and a
separate ActionableScore mechanism.
The purpose of this report is to prioritize Linux kernel CVEs before
manual review, identify cases that require prompt investigation, and
support automatic closure of issues that are unlikely to have meaningful
security impact.
Published priority for this report: MODERATE 7.0
Manual review required: YES
A detailed explanation of the methodology and priority rules is included
at the end of this message.
======================================================================
AL-KERNEL CLASSIFICATION RESULT
======================================================================
CVE-2026-98525 MODERATE https://www.kernelcve.org/list/?q=CVE-2026-98525 CHECK WITH IMPACT FROM ORIG NN LOW | AEGIS IMPACT MODERATE AEGIS_AS=1 LEGACY=MODERATE_KPANIC RESULT=DIFF (final Legacy and Aegis differ; FINAL: MODERATE_KPANIC, Aegis: MODERATE) Maybe valid. Check manually. Hints by AL-KERNEL: The best (paranoid) CVSS is 'AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L';CWE-862;CWE-863;CWE-284;BEST CVSS score: '4.4';DESCR 'An authorization flaw in mctp_lookup_prealloc_tag allows one MCTP socket to match and consume a preallocated tag owned by another socket in the same network namespace. This can let a local process transmit using another socket reserved MCTP tag and disrupt request and response correlation or deny the legitimate socket use of that tag. For the CVSS the PR:L value is used because exploitation requires a local process with access to an MCTP socket in the same network namespace. The demonstrated primitive is cross socket tag misuse and consumption with limited integrity and availability impact. There is no demonstrated memory corruption or direct remote trigger. Automated impact decision path. The original SimpleNet classifier selected LOW. The primary LLM estimated paranoid CVSS 4.4 and the production ActionableScore returned 5 with recommendation Actionable Moderate / Strong Important candidate requiring manual review. The production rules then evaluated CVSS thresholds and ActionableScore thresholds. Recorded rule transitions were CVSS and initial triage stage LOW to MODERATE_KPANIC because the manual review requirement was applied. The legacy KP specialist produced a review artifact and its decision was processed by the applicable KP rules. The legacy FD or DH downgrade specialist has no review artifact for this run. Exact triggered rule markers were INCREASED_FROM_LOW_BASED_ON_REQUIREMANUALCHECK. The independent weaker Aegis shadow evaluated CVSS 4.4 and ActionableScore 1 with primitive class CLASS_C and manual review REQUIRED. Its independently reconciled impact was MODERATE. The models disagreed but the aggregation rules retained the production result. The final reported impact is MODERATE_KPANIC.';YES REQUIRES MANUAL CHECK; ,and ActionableScore result is Actionable Moderate / Strong Important candidate requiring manual review (with actual score 5) MAYBE SIMPLEFIX LINUS PACKET KPANIC INCREASED_FROM_LOW_BASED_ON_REQUIREMANUALCHECK - - checked
======================================================================
ACTIONABLESCORE ANALYSIS
======================================================================
ActionableScore=5
PrimitiveClass=CLASS_A
RealUAF=NO
HostAdminRequired=NO
NamespaceScopedPrivilege=NO
ImportantCandidate=YES
ManualReview=REQUIRED
AutoDowngradeAllowed=NO
RequiresHostUID0=NO
AuthorizationDecisionBypass=YES
ProtectedResourceImpact=CONFIRMED
B4PendingReview=YES
B4PendingConfirmed=YES
1. ActionableScore
* Raw base score: 5.
* Conservative score: 5; no floor or cap applied.
* Raw paranoid score: 5.
* Paranoid score: 5; no additional speculative effects scored.
* Final recommended bucket: **Actionable Moderate / Strong Important candidate requiring manual review**::
2. Signal breakdown
* +2 concrete authorization bypass: `sendto()` with `MCTP_TAG_PREALLOC` searches the namespace-wide key list without enforcing socket ownership, changing the intended failure (`-ENOENT`) into success.
* +1 local below-host-admin trigger: the supplied test and triage evidence establish a second local process using an MCTP socket in the same network namespace; host UID 0 or host-admin capability is not required for the demonstrated misuse.
* +1 integrity impact: socket B transmits using and consumes socket A's reserved tag.
* +1 practical chain: allocate on A → send from B → unauthorized lookup succeeds and consumes A's tag.
* No crash/strong-DoS point: disruption of request correlation or tag availability is limited, not a demonstrated host-wide failure.
* No memory-corruption, disclosure, sensitive-FD theft, LPE, or remote-reachability points.
3. Reachability analysis
The grounded attacker is a local process able to open/use an MCTP socket in the same network namespace as the victim. Network provisioning may require prior administration, but the demonstrated misuse itself does not require host-admin powers or UID 0. No capability check or attacker-created-namespace requirement is shown, so this is not classified as namespace-scoped privilege.
4. Primitive and severity reading
The primitive is a cross-socket ownership authorization bypass, not a UAF or memory corruption. The missing ownership restriction lets a namespace peer consume an active tag explicitly reserved by another socket. The one-line fix cleanly restores protection by iterating only `msk->keys`.
B4-PENDING is confirmed through the concrete path: socket B `sendto(MCTP_TAG_PREALLOC)` → `mctp_lookup_prealloc_tag()` → namespace-wide match of socket A's protected key → unauthorized success and consumption. Impact is limited to tag identity, correlation, and availability; broader data access or privilege escalation is unproven. Class A follows from the demonstrated mandatory ownership decision bypass. Auto-downgrade is disallowed because the protected-resource violation is concrete.
5. One-sentence report phrase
A local MCTP socket can bypass per-socket tag ownership and transmit with and consume another socket's preallocated tag in the same network namespace.
6. Manual review advice
MANUAL CHECK REQUIRED
The demonstrated DENY-to-ALLOW ownership bypass satisfies the B4-PENDING review profile, although its proven impact remains limited.
7. Call-site confidence
Call-site confidence: high
======================================================================
UPSTREAM PATCH SUMMARY
======================================================================
Patch: mctp: route: iterate socket tag list in mctp_lookup_prealloc_tag()
Commit: 09299addab11857e92eca55cd8ef3350b927c90c
Upstream URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=09299addab11857e92eca55cd8ef3350b927c90c
Commit description:
When a socket transmits a packet with MCTP_TAG_PREALLOC set,
mctp_lookup_prealloc_tag() iterates over the per-netns &mns->keys list
and matches netid, req_tag, peer_addr, and manual_alloc, without
checking whether tmp->sk == &msk->sk. This allows any MCTP socket in the
same network namespace to use and consume another socket's preallocated
tag.
Iterate the socket's own tag list (&msk->keys via sklist) instead of the
namespace-wide &mns->keys list in mctp_lookup_prealloc_tag(), ensuring
that only tags allocated by msk are matched.
Tested in QEMU against Linux 7.3.0-rc3 by allocating a manual tag
(0x18) on socket A via SIOCMCTPALLOCTAG for peer EID 9 and sending a
4-byte message with MCTP_TAG_PREALLOC from socket B in the same network
namespace. On the unfixed kernel, sendto(sock_b) using socket A's
preallocated tag succeeds (ret = 4); with this patch applied,
sendto(sock_b) fails with -ENOENT (errno = 2) while sendto(sock_a)
succeeds (ret = 4).
Fixes: 63ed1aa ("mctp: Add SIOCMCTP{ALLOC,DROP}TAG ioctls for tag control")
Suggested-by: Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Changed files:
net/mctp/route.c
Diff excerpt:
Not included in this email. See the upstream URL for the full patch.
Full patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=09299addab11857e92eca55cd8ef3350b927c90c
======================================================================
DETAILED REPORT METHODOLOGY
======================================================================
The original Linux kernel CVE announcement for CVE-2026-98525 can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-98525
The original CVE announcement normally does not include a security-level
estimate. In particular, it may not contain a CVSS assessment, an impact
level, or enough information to determine whether the reported bug is a
practically relevant security issue. One purpose of this parallel CVE list
is to provide that missing technical and prioritization information.
The original goal of the AL-KERNEL project was to prioritize Linux kernel
CVE analysis automatically before manual review. The system can also help
identify non-security issues that may be suitable for automatic closure.
This report was generated by AL-KERNEL, an AI-assisted Linux kernel
vulnerability analysis system developed by Alexander Larkin.
The first analysis stage combines an autonomous classifier with additional
LLM-based analysis. The autonomous classifier runs locally on a CPU and is
based on a backpropagation neural network. Together, these mechanisms
produce a technical vulnerability description, identify likely weakness
types, estimate CVSS severity, and provide input for ActionableScore.
Two CVSS estimates are retained because incomplete kernel vulnerability
information often permits more than one defensible interpretation:
Conservative CVSS vector: Not available
The Best / paranoid CVSS vector: AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
The Best / paranoid CVSS score: 4.4
The conservative vector represents a lower-impact interpretation.
The Best/paranoid vector intentionally represents a plausible upper-bound
interpretation and should not automatically be treated as demonstrated
real-world impact.
CVSS may also need to be adjusted for a particular Linux deployment,
because actual reachability, privileges, enabled kernel configuration,
hardware, namespaces, exposed device nodes, and other environmental
conditions can differ significantly between systems.
A separate ActionableScore mechanism evaluates practical remediation
urgency. Its analysis may include reachability, attack prerequisites,
subsystem exposure, memory-corruption characteristics, denial-of-service
reliability, and possible confidentiality, integrity, or
privilege-escalation impact.
Conservative ActionableScore: unknown
Paranoid ActionableScore: 5
The final base severity is taken directly from the second tab-separated
field of the AL-KERNEL classification result. ActionableScore does not
replace or independently override that final AL-KERNEL decision, and
if ActionableScore adjusted impact level of ALKERNEL, then you would see
self-readable flags above like INCREASED_TO_HIGH_BASED_ON_ACTIONABLESCOREHIGHEREQTHAN7.
For an AL-KERNEL result of MODERATE, this report uses the following
additional presentation split:
ActionableScore below 5 -> MODERATE REGULAR
ActionableScore 5 or more -> MODERATE 7.0
The distinction between MODERATE REGULAR and MODERATE 7.0 makes it
possible to identify Moderate issues that should receive manual analysis
and fixes before lower-priority MODERATE REGULAR issues. In many cases,
MODERATE REGULAR fixes may wait for a later rebase or routine update.
There is one override in which MODERATE REGULAR becomes MODERATE 7.0
even when the ActionableScore is below 5. When the AL-KERNEL result
contains the KPANIC flag, a MODERATE result is always presented as
MODERATE 7.0. The KPANIC flag selected with few regexps without
usage of AI at all, so it helps to detect cases when Kernel Crash happens
and similar (to filter False-Negative results from the LLM usage).
KPANIC indicates that a reliable kernel crash, kernel panic, or similarly
serious kernel availability impact was identified by the classification
workflow.
AL-KERNEL base severity for this report: MODERATE
KPANIC detected for this report: YES
Published priority for this report (same as in Subject): MODERATE 7.0
These results are intended to support engineering triage. They are
machine-generated estimates, and cases marked for manual review should
be validated by a human security engineer before final disposition.
For more info read docs linked from here: https://kernelcve.org/
(and you can submit you own patch there to generate such a report
for non-existant CVE-id yet).
Note that in many cases this AI tool selects higher severity, than
real is (means you can expect Importants instead of Moderate 7.0 or
Moderates 7.0 instead of regular Moderates). If you see such cases,
please use reply email interface to add additional manual analyses
info to this particular CVE.
And please, please, let me know when you see Lows instead of Importants
or Important instead of Low (because particular for such cases I
need to tune this AI tool to make it better for this one and next similar).
My contact email for such notifications is [email protected] (and both
send reply to CVE record itself too and see "reply" button below for howto reply).
reply other threads:[~2026-10-24 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --from, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1) and next cmd tested by kernelcve.org admin:
git send-email --smtp-server=mail.kernelcve.org --smtp-server-port=25 --smtp-auth=none --from='Your Name <youremail@domain.is>' --suppress-cc=all --no-cc \
--in-reply-to=cve-2026-98525.c41d38e4583de26dca45fbd3@kernelcve.org \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
The file with msg could look like this then:
cat YOUR_REPLY
Subject: Re: [CVE-2026-64206][MODERATE REGULAR] Bluetooth: L2CAP test
Just testing public-inbox replies.
Thanks,
MyName
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox