From: AL-KERNEL <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CVE-2026-63821][LOW] wifi: rtw88: usb: fix memory leaks on USB write failures
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:10:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
CVE: CVE-2026-63821
Priority: LOW
AL-KERNEL base severity: LOW
KPANIC flag: NO
Patch: wifi: rtw88: usb: fix memory leaks on USB write failures
Commit: 2b2060c2075a72bc2de43ce5e1b9347d6c5e27bb
Upstream patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=2b2060c2075a72bc2de43ce5e1b9347d6c5e27bb
Original CVE announcement: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-63821
Analysis date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:10:24 -0400
ActionableScore: 2
ActionableScore lower bound: 1
Actionable bucket: Ordinary Moderate / Low-like
Manual review required: NO
Summary:
No one-sentence report phrase was found.
======================================================================
ABOUT THIS REPORT
======================================================================
The original Linux kernel CVE announcement for CVE-2026-63821 is available here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-63821
The original announcement does not normally provide a security severity
estimate, CVSS assessment, or enough information to determine whether the
reported kernel bug represents a practically relevant security issue.
This report was generated by AL-KERNEL, an AI-assisted Linux kernel
vulnerability analysis system developed by Alexander Larkin. It combines
an autonomous classifier with LLM-assisted technical analysis and a
separate ActionableScore mechanism.
The purpose of this report is to prioritize Linux kernel CVEs before
manual review, identify cases that require prompt investigation, and
support automatic closure of issues that are unlikely to have meaningful
security impact.
Published priority for this report: LOW
Manual review required: NO
A detailed explanation of the methodology and priority rules is included
at the end of this message.
======================================================================
AL-KERNEL CLASSIFICATION RESULT
======================================================================
CVE-2026-63821 LOW CHECK WITH IMPACT FROM ORIG NN IMPORTANT Maybe valid. Check manually. Hints by AL-KERNEL: The best (paranoid) CVSS is 'AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H';*CWE-401;*CWE-772;**CWE-400;Other CVSS 'AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L';BEST CVSS score: '4.7';DESCR 'A memory leak in the rtw88 USB transmit path occurs because rtw_usb_write_data() and rtw_usb_tx_agg_skb() relied on the URB completion callback to free skbs and txcb state, but that callback is not executed when rtw_usb_write_port() fails to submit the URB. A local user can contribute to triggering the leak by generating transmit traffic while the USB WiFi device is disconnecting or while the system is under memory pressure, but reliable triggering depends on hardware state and failure timing. For the CVSS the PR:L is used for the paranoid score because an unprivileged local user or service may be able to generate traffic through the device, while the actual submit failure still depends on local system conditions. The issue is not network reachable as a remote packet processing bug and the impact is denial of service through memory consumption rather than privilege escalation.';NO MANUAL CHECK; ,and ActionableScore result is Ordinary Moderate / Low-like (with actual score 2) YES REMOTE USB LEAK NETWORK SKB HARDWARE LINUS LOWERED_FROM_HIGH_BASED_ON_GUESSCVSS DECREASED_TO_MODERATEREG_BASED_ON_ACTIONABLESCORELESSTHAN5 DECREASED_TO_LOW_FROM_MODERATE_BASED_ON_ACTIONABLESCORELESSTHAN3 NO NO checked
======================================================================
ACTIONABLESCORE ANALYSIS
======================================================================
ActionableScore=2
ActionableScoreLower=1
1. ActionableScore
* Conservative score: 1
* Paranoid score: 2
* Final recommended bucket: **Ordinary Moderate / Low-like**::
2. Signal breakdown
* Local unprivileged trigger: +1. A local user may generate WiFi TX traffic, but reliable triggering also needs URB submission failure such as disconnect, reconnect, or ENOMEM.
* Availability impact realistic: +1 in the paranoid interpretation. Repeated leaks of skb, txcb, and aggregated skbs could contribute to memory pressure or resource exhaustion.
* Hard or unreliable condition: -1 for the conservative score. The leak requires an error path where rtw_usb_write_port() fails before the completion callback runs.
* No memory corruption signal. The patch fixes missing cleanup on submit failure, not UAF, double free, OOB write, type confusion, or page-cache corruption.
* No LPE signal. There is no reclaim, overwrite, callback control, refcount takeover, or object confusion primitive shown.
3. Reachability analysis
A local user or local service that can send traffic through the affected rtw88 USB WiFi device can increase TX activity, but the actual leak depends on USB submit failure conditions such as device disconnect or memory pressure. This is not remotely network-triggerable as a packet-processing bug. Namespaces do not materially improve reachability unless the device is intentionally exposed to an untrusted workload. The affected path requires specific Realtek rtw88 USB hardware and the USB transmit error path.
4. Severity interpretation
This behaves like a low-end Moderate or Low-like resource leak. The theoretical worst case is local denial of service through sustained memory consumption, but the patch does not support memory corruption, privilege escalation, confidentiality impact, or integrity impact. The realistic exploitation evidence is limited to cleanup failure during disconnect/reconnect or ENOMEM scenarios.
5. One-sentence report phrase
A cleanup bug in the rtw88 USB transmit path can leak skbs and txcb state when URB submission fails, allowing a local traffic source under device failure or memory pressure conditions to cause resource exhaustion DoS.
6. Manual review recommendation
NO MANUAL CHECK NEEDED. This is a bounded resource-leak cleanup fix with no demonstrated memory corruption, security-boundary bypass, remote trigger, or privilege-escalation primitive.
======================================================================
UPSTREAM PATCH SUMMARY
======================================================================
Patch: wifi: rtw88: usb: fix memory leaks on USB write failures
Commit: 2b2060c2075a72bc2de43ce5e1b9347d6c5e27bb
Upstream URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=2b2060c2075a72bc2de43ce5e1b9347d6c5e27bb
Commit description:
When rtw_usb_write_port() fails to submit a USB Request Block (URB)
(e.g., due to device disconnect or ENOMEM), the completion callback is
never executed.
Currently, the driver ignores the return value of rtw_usb_write_port()
in rtw_usb_write_data() and rtw_usb_tx_agg_skb(). Because these
functions rely on the completion callback to free the socket buffers
(skbs) and the transaction control block (txcb), a submission failure
results in:
1. A memory leak of the allocated skb in rtw_usb_write_data().
2. A memory leak of the txcb structure and all aggregated skbs in
rtw_usb_tx_agg_skb().
Fix this by checking the return value of rtw_usb_write_port(). If it
fails, explicitly free the skb in rtw_usb_write_data(), and properly
purge the tx_ack_queue and free the txcb in rtw_usb_tx_agg_skb().
The issue was discovered in practice during device disconnect/reconnect
scenarios and memory pressure conditions. Tested by verifying normal TX
operation continues after the fix without regressions.
Fixes: a82dfd3 ("wifi: rtw88: Add common USB chip support")
Cc: [email protected]
Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Luka Gejak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Changed files:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/usb.c
Diff excerpt:
Not included in this email. See the upstream URL for the full patch.
Full patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=2b2060c2075a72bc2de43ce5e1b9347d6c5e27bb
======================================================================
DETAILED REPORT METHODOLOGY
======================================================================
The original Linux kernel CVE announcement for CVE-2026-63821 can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-63821
The original CVE announcement normally does not include a security-level
estimate. In particular, it may not contain a CVSS assessment, an impact
level, or enough information to determine whether the reported bug is a
practically relevant security issue. One purpose of this parallel CVE list
is to provide that missing technical and prioritization information.
The original goal of the AL-KERNEL project was to prioritize Linux kernel
CVE analysis automatically before manual review. The system can also help
identify non-security issues that may be suitable for automatic closure.
This report was generated by AL-KERNEL, an AI-assisted Linux kernel
vulnerability analysis system developed by Alexander Larkin.
The first analysis stage combines an autonomous classifier with additional
LLM-based analysis. The autonomous classifier runs locally on a CPU and is
based on a backpropagation neural network. Together, these mechanisms
produce a technical vulnerability description, identify likely weakness
types, estimate CVSS severity, and provide input for ActionableScore.
Two CVSS estimates are retained because incomplete kernel vulnerability
information often permits more than one defensible interpretation:
Conservative CVSS vector: AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
The Best / paranoid CVSS vector: AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
The Best / paranoid CVSS score: 4.7
The conservative vector represents a lower-impact interpretation.
The Best/paranoid vector intentionally represents a plausible upper-bound
interpretation and should not automatically be treated as demonstrated
real-world impact.
CVSS may also need to be adjusted for a particular Linux deployment,
because actual reachability, privileges, enabled kernel configuration,
hardware, namespaces, exposed device nodes, and other environmental
conditions can differ significantly between systems.
A separate ActionableScore mechanism evaluates practical remediation
urgency. Its analysis may include reachability, attack prerequisites,
subsystem exposure, memory-corruption characteristics, denial-of-service
reliability, and possible confidentiality, integrity, or
privilege-escalation impact.
Conservative ActionableScore: 1
Paranoid ActionableScore: 2
The final base severity is taken directly from the second tab-separated
field of the AL-KERNEL classification result. ActionableScore does not
replace or independently override that final AL-KERNEL decision, and
if ActionableScore adjusted impact level of ALKERNEL, then you would see
self-readable flags above like INCREASED_TO_HIGH_BASED_ON_ACTIONABLESCOREHIGHEREQTHAN7.
For an AL-KERNEL result of MODERATE, this report uses the following
additional presentation split:
ActionableScore below 5 -> MODERATE REGULAR
ActionableScore 5 or more -> MODERATE 7.0
The distinction between MODERATE REGULAR and MODERATE 7.0 makes it
possible to identify Moderate issues that should receive manual analysis
and fixes before lower-priority MODERATE REGULAR issues. In many cases,
MODERATE REGULAR fixes may wait for a later rebase or routine update.
There is one override in which MODERATE REGULAR becomes MODERATE 7.0
even when the ActionableScore is below 5. When the AL-KERNEL result
contains the KPANIC flag, a MODERATE result is always presented as
MODERATE 7.0. The KPANIC flag selected with few regexps without
usage of AI at all, so it helps to detect cases when Kernel Crash happens
and similar (to filter False-Negative results from the LLM usage).
KPANIC indicates that a reliable kernel crash, kernel panic, or similarly
serious kernel availability impact was identified by the classification
workflow.
AL-KERNEL base severity for this report: LOW
KPANIC detected for this report: NO
Published priority for this report (same as in Subject): LOW
These results are intended to support engineering triage. They are
machine-generated estimates, and cases marked for manual review should
be validated by a human security engineer before final disposition.
For more info read docs linked from here: https://kernelcve.org/
(and you can submit you own patch there to generate such a report
for non-existant CVE-id yet).
Note that in many cases this AI tool selects higher severity, than
real is (means you can expect Importants instead of Moderate 7.0 or
Moderates 7.0 instead of regular Moderates). If you see such cases,
please use reply email interface to add additional manual analyses
info to this particular CVE.
And please, please, let me know when you see Lows instead of Importants
or Important instead of Low (because particular for such cases I
need to tune this AI tool to make it better for this one and next similar).
My contact email for such notifications is [email protected] (and both
send reply to CVE record itself too and see "reply" button below for howto reply).
reply other threads:[~2026-07-19 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --from, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1) and next cmd tested by kernelcve.org admin:
git send-email --smtp-server=mail.kernelcve.org --smtp-server-port=25 --smtp-auth=none --from='Your Name <youremail@domain.is>' --suppress-cc=all --no-cc \
--in-reply-to=cve-2026-63821.191fd3b85479b5541822b03d@kernelcve.org \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
The file with msg could look like this then:
cat YOUR_REPLY
Subject: Re: [CVE-2026-64206][MODERATE REGULAR] Bluetooth: L2CAP test
Just testing public-inbox replies.
Thanks,
MyName
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox