From: AL-KERNEL <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CVE-2026-53289][LOW] ice: fix NULL pointer dereference in ice_reset_all_vfs() [ Upstream
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:30:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
CVE: CVE-2026-53289
Priority: LOW
AL-KERNEL base severity: LOW
KPANIC flag: NO
Patch: ice: fix NULL pointer dereference in ice_reset_all_vfs() [ Upstream
Commit: acc76b97902757b63ba5136f787d107647236a19
Upstream patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=acc76b97902757b63ba5136f787d107647236a19
Original CVE announcement: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-53289
Analysis date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:30:18 -0400
ActionableScore: 2
ActionableScore lower bound: 1
Actionable bucket: Ordinary Moderate / Low-like, not an Important candidate
Manual review required: NO
Summary:
A failed VSI rebuild in the Intel ice driver can leave VF queue mapping pointers NULL, and `ice_reset_all_vfs()` may continue post-rebuild handling and trigger a kernel NULL pointer dereference during local device maintenance or firmware update operations.
======================================================================
ABOUT THIS REPORT
======================================================================
The original Linux kernel CVE announcement for CVE-2026-53289 is available here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-53289
The original announcement does not normally provide a security severity
estimate, CVSS assessment, or enough information to determine whether the
reported kernel bug represents a practically relevant security issue.
This report was generated by AL-KERNEL, an AI-assisted Linux kernel
vulnerability analysis system developed by Alexander Larkin. It combines
an autonomous classifier with LLM-assisted technical analysis and a
separate ActionableScore mechanism.
The purpose of this report is to prioritize Linux kernel CVEs before
manual review, identify cases that require prompt investigation, and
support automatic closure of issues that are unlikely to have meaningful
security impact.
Published priority for this report: LOW
Manual review required: NO
A detailed explanation of the methodology and priority rules is included
at the end of this message.
======================================================================
AL-KERNEL CLASSIFICATION RESULT
======================================================================
CVE-2026-53289 LOW CHECK Maybe valid. Check manually. Hints by AL-KERNEL: The best (paranoid) CVSS is 'AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H';CWE-252;**CWE-476;CWE-754;Other CVSS 'AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H';BEST CVSS score: '4.7';DESCR 'A NULL pointer dereference in the Intel ice driver can occur when ice_reset_all_vfs() continues VF post rebuild handling after ice_vf_rebuild_vsi() has failed. During NVM firmware update or a related PF reset condition, a failed VSI rebuild can leave txq_map and rxq_map as NULL while the VSI object still exists, and later ice_vf_post_vsi_rebuild() can reach ice_ena_vf_q_mappings() and dereference vsi txq_map. For the CVSS the PR:L is used for the paranoid score because a reduced capability root, service account, or delegated maintenance process may be able to trigger device reset or firmware update paths in some deployments. The issue is not network reachable through packet traffic and normally requires local administrative or maintenance access to the affected host. Impact is denial of service via kernel crash, with no supported evidence of information disclosure, data corruption, UAF, or privilege escalation.';NO MANUAL CHECK; ,and ActionableScore result is Ordinary Moderate / Low-like, not an Important candidate (with actual score 2) YES REMOTE LOCK DANGER NULLPTR ERRORPATH NETWORK KERNEL_PANIC_PLUS_UAF HARDWARE DECREASED_TO_MODERATE_REGULAR_FROM_MODERATE7_BASED_ON_GUESSCVSS_AND_CIANNH DECREASED_TO_LOW_FROM_MODERATE_BASED_ON_ACTIONABLESCORELESSTHAN3 NO NO checked
======================================================================
ACTIONABLESCORE ANALYSIS
======================================================================
ActionableScore=2
ActionableScoreLower=1
## 1. ActionableScore
* Conservative score: 1
* Paranoid score: 2
* Final recommended bucket: **Ordinary Moderate / Low-like, not an Important candidate**
## 2. Signal breakdown
Conservative signals:
* Reliable kernel crash / strong DoS: +1
The patch and crash trace show a concrete NULL pointer dereference in `ice_ena_vf_q_mappings()` after `ice_vf_rebuild_vsi()` fails.
* Requires admin/root/device maintenance privileges: -2
The demonstrated trigger is NVM firmware update or PF/VF reset handling, which normally requires administrative access.
* Rare and difficult-to-reach runtime condition: -1
The crash requires SR-IOV/VF reset handling plus failed VSI rebuild during a firmware transitional state.
* Availability impact realistic: +1
The failure is a host kernel panic, not just a harmless warning.
Paranoid additions / adjustments:
* Firmware-mediated external influence: +1
The failure depends on firmware/Admin Queue behavior during NVM update, so a firmware-mediated condition contributes to reachability.
* Reduced privilege maintenance model considered: +1 effective adjustment
In some deployments, firmware update or device reset may be delegated to a service account or reduced-capability operator rather than full host root.
No memory-corruption or LPE signals are awarded:
* This is a NULL pointer dereference on an allocated but partially initialized `ice_vsi`.
* The patch does not show UAF, double free, OOB write, stale callback, attacker-controlled reclaim, type confusion, refcount takeover, or arbitrary write.
* No confidentiality or integrity primitive is supported.
## 3. Reachability analysis
The realistic trigger is local administrative or maintenance access to the affected Intel `ice` PF device, especially during NVM firmware update or a related reset path where VSI rebuild can fail. A normal remote network peer sending packets is not a credible trigger from this patch. Namespace or container delegation could lower the practical privilege requirement only if the environment exposes device reset, devlink, firmware update, or PF maintenance operations to a reduced-privilege service account. The affected driver is relevant in server and data-center NIC deployments, but the failing path is not default packet processing and requires specific SR-IOV plus firmware/update/reset conditions.
## 4. Severity interpretation
This behaves like an ordinary Moderate or Low-like kernel DoS, not an Important-class vulnerability. The theoretical impact is a host crash, but the demonstrated primitive is only NULL dereference after unchecked error handling. There is no realistic evidence of privilege escalation, memory corruption beyond invalid NULL access, or sensitive data exposure. The paranoid score remains low because the highest defensible interpretation is still a constrained local maintenance-triggered DoS.
## 5. One-sentence report phrase
A failed VSI rebuild in the Intel ice driver can leave VF queue mapping pointers NULL, and `ice_reset_all_vfs()` may continue post-rebuild handling and trigger a kernel NULL pointer dereference during local device maintenance or firmware update operations.
## 6. Manual review recommendation
NO MANUAL CHECK NEEDED
This can be auto-closed for urgent security triage unless the local environment delegates firmware update or PF reset control to untrusted users. The patch supports a local privileged DoS only, with no credible LPE or memory corruption primitive.
======================================================================
UPSTREAM PATCH SUMMARY
======================================================================
Patch: ice: fix NULL pointer dereference in ice_reset_all_vfs() [ Upstream
Commit: acc76b97902757b63ba5136f787d107647236a19
Upstream URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=acc76b97902757b63ba5136f787d107647236a19
Changed files:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_vf_lib.c
Diff excerpt:
Not included in this email. See the upstream URL for the full patch.
Full patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=acc76b97902757b63ba5136f787d107647236a19
======================================================================
DETAILED REPORT METHODOLOGY
======================================================================
The original Linux kernel CVE announcement for CVE-2026-53289 can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/?q=CVE-2026-53289
The original CVE announcement normally does not include a security-level
estimate. In particular, it may not contain a CVSS assessment, an impact
level, or enough information to determine whether the reported bug is a
practically relevant security issue. One purpose of this parallel CVE list
is to provide that missing technical and prioritization information.
The original goal of the AL-KERNEL project was to prioritize Linux kernel
CVE analysis automatically before manual review. The system can also help
identify non-security issues that may be suitable for automatic closure.
This report was generated by AL-KERNEL, an AI-assisted Linux kernel
vulnerability analysis system developed by Alexander Larkin.
The first analysis stage combines an autonomous classifier with additional
LLM-based analysis. The autonomous classifier runs locally on a CPU and is
based on a backpropagation neural network. Together, these mechanisms
produce a technical vulnerability description, identify likely weakness
types, estimate CVSS severity, and provide input for ActionableScore.
Two CVSS estimates are retained because incomplete kernel vulnerability
information often permits more than one defensible interpretation:
Conservative CVSS vector: AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
The Best / paranoid CVSS vector: AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
The Best / paranoid CVSS score: 4.7
The conservative vector represents a lower-impact interpretation.
The Best/paranoid vector intentionally represents a plausible upper-bound
interpretation and should not automatically be treated as demonstrated
real-world impact.
CVSS may also need to be adjusted for a particular Linux deployment,
because actual reachability, privileges, enabled kernel configuration,
hardware, namespaces, exposed device nodes, and other environmental
conditions can differ significantly between systems.
A separate ActionableScore mechanism evaluates practical remediation
urgency. Its analysis may include reachability, attack prerequisites,
subsystem exposure, memory-corruption characteristics, denial-of-service
reliability, and possible confidentiality, integrity, or
privilege-escalation impact.
Conservative ActionableScore: 1
Paranoid ActionableScore: 2
The final base severity is taken directly from the second tab-separated
field of the AL-KERNEL classification result. ActionableScore does not
replace or independently override that final AL-KERNEL decision, and
if ActionableScore adjusted impact level of ALKERNEL, then you would see
self-readable flags above like INCREASED_TO_HIGH_BASED_ON_ACTIONABLESCOREHIGHEREQTHAN7.
For an AL-KERNEL result of MODERATE, this report uses the following
additional presentation split:
ActionableScore below 5 -> MODERATE REGULAR
ActionableScore 5 or more -> MODERATE 7.0
The distinction between MODERATE REGULAR and MODERATE 7.0 makes it
possible to identify Moderate issues that should receive manual analysis
and fixes before lower-priority MODERATE REGULAR issues. In many cases,
MODERATE REGULAR fixes may wait for a later rebase or routine update.
There is one override in which MODERATE REGULAR becomes MODERATE 7.0
even when the ActionableScore is below 5. When the AL-KERNEL result
contains the KPANIC flag, a MODERATE result is always presented as
MODERATE 7.0. The KPANIC flag selected with few regexps without
usage of AI at all, so it helps to detect cases when Kernel Crash happens
and similar (to filter False-Negative results from the LLM usage).
KPANIC indicates that a reliable kernel crash, kernel panic, or similarly
serious kernel availability impact was identified by the classification
workflow.
AL-KERNEL base severity for this report: LOW
KPANIC detected for this report: NO
Published priority for this report (same as in Subject): LOW
These results are intended to support engineering triage. They are
machine-generated estimates, and cases marked for manual review should
be validated by a human security engineer before final disposition.
For more info read docs linked from here: https://kernelcve.org/
(and you can submit you own patch there to generate such a report
for non-existant CVE-id yet).
Note that in many cases this AI tool selects higher severity, than
real is (means you can expect Importants instead of Moderate 7.0 or
Moderates 7.0 instead of regular Moderates). If you see such cases,
please use reply email interface to add additional manual analyses
info to this particular CVE.
And please, please, let me know when you see Lows instead of Importants
or Important instead of Low (because particular for such cases I
need to tune this AI tool to make it better for this one and next similar).
My contact email for such notifications is [email protected] (and both
send reply to CVE record itself too and see "reply" button below for howto reply).
reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --from, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1) and next cmd tested by kernelcve.org admin:
git send-email --smtp-server=mail.kernelcve.org --smtp-server-port=25 --smtp-auth=none --from='Your Name <youremail@domain.is>' --suppress-cc=all --no-cc \
--in-reply-to=cve-2026-53289.1f42f2a7674068b80d3ee24b@kernelcve.org \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
The file with msg could look like this then:
cat YOUR_REPLY
Subject: Re: [CVE-2026-64206][MODERATE REGULAR] Bluetooth: L2CAP test
Just testing public-inbox replies.
Thanks,
MyName
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox